I have strange problem with JMagick library. I use Debian, so I have installed libjmagick6-java and libjmagick6-jni, and here are steps I have done. Congratulations, you have a working ImageMagick distribution under Mac OS X and you are ready to use ImageMagick to convert, compose, or edit your images or perhaps you'll want to use one of the Application Program Interfaces for C, C, Perl, and others. IOS Binary Release Claudio provides iOS builds of ImageMagick. Download iOS Distribution.

This tip replaces version 2126 originally released on the Discussions Feedback forum. Find the serial number on: Plug your serial number in at this link: Do not use third party links as they may not be secure. Do not post the serial number on this board, as that is your key to any support you may have left. Use this tip also to help figure out which portion of the Support Community to post in, as this tip explains: When you have no serial number, use one of these third party sites to find your model, production year, time in year (early, middle, late, summer, fall, winter, spring): Note: PowerMac, PowerPC, eMac, iMac PPC, iBook (Apple recycled the name iBook for its eBook application on new Macs and iOS devices), Powerbook, Classic all refer to Macs that are older than the present series of Macs. Posting in those forums about a current Mac, shows you have not researched your Mac sufficiently to get a succinct answer to your query. Apple menu - About This Mac will tell you the Mac OS version or System version you are running. The X in the version is important, and so is the preceding 10 in the version if it exists.

Charles 4.1.2 released with bug fixes and minor improvements. Charles 4.1.1 released with bug fixes. This changes the SSL signing for Charles on Mac OS X to use Apple's new Developer ID code-signing. Charles v3.6.5 released including bug fixes and minor changes.

Questions saying X.1 could refer to Mac OS X 10.13.1, 10.1. Don't truncate the version you see. There are no iOS forums specific to the operating system found on iPads, iPod Touch, AppleTV, Apple Watch, and iPhones.

Figure out the type of portable device you are running to ask a question about that device specifically. Apple has these identifying articles as well: - MacBook Air - MacBook - MacBook Pro - Mac Mini - Mac Pro - iMac and - PowerMac G5 and - PowerMac G4 - PowerMac G3 - Powerbook G4 - eMac - Powerbook G3 - iBook Macs generally will not run an older Mac OS X operating system than shipped with them. The one exception is virtualizing 10.6 Server on 10.7 or later, which is described later. Also important to note is that the Apple App Store only has 10.7, 10.8, and 10.12, except for those who purchased in between systems, and have a Mac that shipped with in between systems. For all others if you need an in between system, and your Mac is older, contact the App Store tech support. A quick upgrade guide has been posted on These dates are important for recognizing what Mac OS X will run on Macs.

Macs released on or after (including their model #s or name where known): September 30, 2018 will only run 10.14 or later. MacBook Air 8,x. Mac Mini 8,x September 25, 2017 will only run 10.13 or later. iMac Pro 1,1. MacBook Pro 15,x (2018 model) June 5, 2017 Mac models (all 2017 Models except iMac Pro) will only run 10.12.5 or later.

MacBook Pro 14,x. MacBook Air 7,2. MacBook 10,1. iMac 18,x September 20, 2016 will only run 10.12 or later. MacBook Pro with touchbar (instead of physical F keys).

MacBook Pro 13,x. iMac 18,x. MacBook Air 7,2 see on which ones could only run 10.12 or later. September 30, 2015 will only run 10.11 or later.

These Macs are the first Macs that can be upgraded directly to Mac OS 10.14 without installing any other software. iMac 16,x and 17,x.

Macbook 9,x (these Macbooks came with the USB-C, instead of the USB 2 or USB 3 connector. USB 3 and 2 look identical on the outside, use System Profiler to determine which you have) October 16, 2014 will only run 10.10 or later (10.10 is only available for Macs that shipped with it). MacBook Air 7,1 and 7,2 ( could only run 10.12 or later).

Mac Mini 7,x. iMac MF885LL/A came with 10.10.2. All other 15,x came with 10.10.0.

MacBook 8,x - the oldest that can run Mac OS 10.14 with this model name after installing 10.11 or later. MacBook Pro 11,4 and 11,5 October 22, 2013 will only run 10.9 or later (10.9 is only available for Macs that shipped with it). Macbook Pro 11,1 through 11,3.

Mac Pro 6,x. MacBook Air Early 2014. Mac Mini 6,x. iMac 14,4 June 25, 2012 will only run 10.8 or later. 10.8 through 10.11 are supported by these Macs indicate machine ID found in profiler, and newer models may run some variety of 10.9, 10.10, or 10.11):. MacBook Pro with Retina EMC 2557 from 2012 and 2013 and later models.

MacBook Air (2013 or newer) 6,1. MacBook Air (Mid 2013 or newer) 6,1. Mac mini (Late 2012 or newer) 6,1 - the oldest that can run 10.14 after installing 10.11 or later. iMac (Late 2012 or newer) 13,1. Mac Pro (Late 2013) 6,1 These models above are the first models that can be upgraded directly to High Sierra 10.13 without other prior upgrades. The oldest MacBook Air and iMac that can run Mac OS 10.14 after installing 10.11. MacBook Air 5,1.

iMac 12,1 These Macs which are older can also be upgraded to 10.12 by upgrading to 10.7.5 first, and 10.13 by upgrading to 10.8 first:. MacBook (Late 2009 or newer) 6,1. MacBook Pro (Mid 2010 or newer) 6,1. MacBook Air (Late 2010 or newer) 3,1. Mac mini (Mid 2010 or newer) 4,1.

iMac (Late 2009 or newer) 10,1. Mac Pro (Mid 2010 or newer) 5,1 The Macs are compatible with 10.8 and later from prior 10.8's release. Mac Pro (Early 2008 with AirPort Extreme card, or Mid 2012) 3,1-5,1 (Earlier Mac Pros are discussed on the ). MacBook Late 2008 5,1 to mid 2010 7,1 with no Pro or Air in the name.

iMac (Early 2009 to mid-2011) 9,1 to 12,1. Mac mini (Mid 2010 to mid 2011) 4,1 to 5.1. MacBook Air (Late 2010 to mid-2012 3,1-5,2. MacBook Pro Late 2008 5,1 to Retina 2012 that are not EMC 2557.

Jmagick-6.2.4-1 For Mac Os X

July 20, 2011 will only run 10.7 or later. The model IDs (x,x) and EMC that fit this description until June 25, 2012 release of 10.8 (excluding the ones which will run only 10.8 or later earlier mentioned): iMac of an EMC of 2496; 13,x and later. Mac Mini 5,x and later. Macbook Air 4,x and later. MacBook 8,x and later (no Pro no Air in the name) Mac Pro 5,1 with EMC 2629 - the oldest that can be have Mac OS 10.14 installed after installing 10.11 or later, those without that EMC number came with 10.6 and can also be updated to 10.14 the same manner; 6,x and later. MacBook Pro with EMC 2555, 2563; 9,x and later.

Note all the Macs that can only run 10.7 and later, may be able to run 10.6 Server with Parallels, if you need compatibility with an older operating system: Beyond this point Macs released during certain date ranges also have a maximum operating system, and/or minimum retail operating system and system specific operating system requirement (when I say up to 10.9 that includes all incremental updates): Note: images shown below for retail operating system are those that have no 'Update, Dropin, or OEM' wording on them. March 15, 2010-July 19, 2011 will only run prebundled 10.6 installer disc, and not retail, but also able to be upgraded to 10.9. Note this tip if upgrading to 10.7 or later: August 28, 2009-March 14, 2010 will only 10.6 or later up to 10.9. And will at minimum be able to use 10.6.3 retailto install 10.6. Note this tip if upgrading to 10.7 or later: During 2000 to 2009, the serial number also made it easier to identify the Macs, as the 3rd, 4th, and 5th character of the serial number referred to the week and year of the shipment date.

Thus for serial numbers where x can be any letter or number, xxABCxxxxx serial numbers would refer to an A which is the last digit of the year, and BC=week of the year. Xx905xxxx is the fifth week of 2009. You can then use Wikipedia to figure out what date the release was, and if it was after a specific retail release of an operating system to determine which pre bundled disc it came with, and which later retail discs the Mac could work with. December 15, 2008-August 28, 2009 will only run prebundled 10.5 installer disc, and 10.6 retail, and if on will also run up to Mac OS X 10.11 if you follow this tip: October 28, 2007 -December 14, 2008 will at minimum be able to use the 10.5.6 retail, and install up to 10.9 if included on if you follow this tip January 10, 2006-October 27, 2007 will at minimum be able to 10.5 retail, and if on or are able to run 10.9. Core2Duo and Xeon can upgrade to a minimum of 10.7.5. Otherwise if they only have a CoreDuo, CoreSolo Intel processor only be able to upgrade to Mac OS X 10.6.8. G5, G4, and G3 processors are not Intel.

Earlier dates are covered on this tip: Using the dates from the above documents, and the dates according to Wikipedia when specific retail operating system systems were released, you can find which retail releases were newer than the Macs and the ones immediately older. I.e.: An October 24, 2011 Macbook Pro will only run 10.8 retail, and 10.9 retail downloads, but needs an AppleCare requested 10.7 installer to install 10.7. An exception exists in 10.6 Server, as indicated here: A pre-October 26, 2007 MacBook Pro will only run the system specific Mac OS X 10.4 installer that shipped with it, which can be ordered from AppleCare, or newer retail installer versions of 10.5, 10.6 compatible with its hardware, and 10.7 if it is at least a Core2Duo. CoreDuo, nor is CoreSolo is not compatible with 10.7. For PowerPC Macs, Mac OS X 10.4.11 and earlier offer Classic compatibility, and on certain 2003 and earlier Macs dual booting on Mac OS X 10.5 & Mac OS 9: No Mac may run an older version of Mac OS 9 than was prebundled with it. A more precise timeline of Mac OS X follows (in U.S. Date notation.

Apple Footer. This site contains user submitted content, comments and opinions and is for informational purposes only. Apple may provide or recommend responses as a possible solution based on the information provided; every potential issue may involve several factors not detailed in the conversations captured in an electronic forum and Apple can therefore provide no guarantee as to the efficacy of any proposed solutions on the community forums. Apple disclaims any and all liability for the acts, omissions and conduct of any third parties in connection with or related to your use of the site. All postings and use of the content on this site are subject to the.

Part of the functionality of the Pachyderm authoring application is the dynamic and on-the-fly resizing of images to whatever dimensions are required by the flash templates that are used to display a screen in a presentation. I wrote the first version of the image resizing code using (JAI), and it worked quite well. But, during the authoring of the Mavericks prototype, it became apparent that the quality of the resized images wasn’t quite up to snuff. I tried setting JAI to use bicubic interpolation (InterpolationBicubic and InterpolationBicubic2) instead of the default nearest-neighbour (InterpolationNearest) method. Still produced inconsistent results. I had looked at using, using the java bridge, but that was just plain funky. It relies on a JNI bridge that apparently doesn’t compile well on MacOSX (I never got it compiled, and Google only turned up one person in the history of the internets that had success – on an older version of the OS).

Fast forward to last night. I decided to try an ImageMagick solution using java’s Runtime.exec – and it works perfectly.

Image quality is MUCH better. The memory issues we were seeing with JAI disappeared (JAI was barfing on Very Large Images, where ImageMagick chews through them with ease). The downside is that it takes considerably longer to process the resized images, and since ImageMagick can only work with local files (not URLs), I have to download the image from the web each time I want to process it (this can be done more intelligently – I just haven’t done that yet). Compare the output of the two resize methods. I have done this kind of hack already. I use it nearly for any image transformation I have coded in EverLearn a LCMS I have done the last 2 and a half years. You can do amazing things with imagemagick.

Jmagick-6.2.4-1 For Mac Os

And it does not use up nearly the same amount of memory as the Java-Solution does. Memory (better: missing Memory) using java-solution JAI is clearly an issue here.

Go with imagemagick its very powerful and stable! Drop me an eMail if I should give you some insight on whats possible using e.g. WebObjects in conjunction with ImageMagick. Regards, helge. # Hi, I had to do this to get jmagick installed on OS X. # see To install jmagick, follow instructions at, basically just download, untar/gzip and./configure make Except for some changes instead of “make install” cd to src/magick steve:JMagick-6.2.4-1/src/magick tammy% foreach f ( `ls.c` ) foreach?

Recover unsaved word document word for mac. Recover the Word doc from the AutoRecovery folder. Word for Mac has a built-in autosave feature called AutoRecover which is switched on by default.

Cc -I/usr/local/src/JMagick-6.2.4-1/generated/magick -I/usr/local/include -I/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/A/Headers/ -I/usr/local/include -DREENTRANT -INONE -c /usr/local/src/JMagick-6.2.4-1/src/magick/$f -fno-common -DPIC foreach? End Then (my ImageMagick is installed in /usr/local directly. You wrote nicely about ImageMagic, but not about JAI that you are comparing. While you are giving information how JAI scaled your example images (bicubic), you don’t tell us how ImageMagic does it. Change JAI scaling fom Bicubic to NearestNeighbour it will speed scaling up by factor 4 to 6 (especially when dealing with huge color images). If you want to scale bitonal images (even large bitonal images), JAI is fast – and provides a very good quality, if you choose “subsampletogray”. My experience is, that JAI is much better in quality and faster when it comes to scale bitonal and greyscale images.

I’ve been playing with JAI lately and I find its performance utterly horrible (Running on Java 1.5.006 with 1.1.3 and native accelerators). It takes 15-45 seconds to rotate a 5megapixel image and scale down to thumbnail size (140xYYY).

That isn’t even counting encoding back to JPEG. Not to mention, like you point out above, both BICUBIC and BICUBIC2 have very poor scaling performance compared to the default settings of ImageMagick (I often use PerlMagick and may soon become a user of JMagick as well) when scaling photographs. Well, it isn’t as horrible as I first made JAI out to be, downscaling photographs using BILINEAR interpolation is much better than either BICUBIC variant. It’s not as nice as the default Lanczos or Mitchell filters in ImageMagick, but it’s a step in the right direction. I can’t use ImageMagick or JMagick because either approach requires round-tripping from a java Image object to a file and back, and that’s just a horrible approach.

(If there’s another method to convert to MagickImage and back in Java, I don’t know it). Hi, I had to create a thumbnail generator this year using JAI. If you want to get thumbnails with a very good better quality, you can apply a bilinear or a bicubic interpolation algorithm several times (ex: 4-5 times) on a given image. For instance, if you have to scale an image down by 50%, scale it by SQRT(50%) the first time and scale the resulting image by SQRT(50%).

If you want to scale an image using n pass, simply scale the image down by (percentage)^(1/nPass) (use math.pow!) at each pass to get a final image scaled down by percentage% Using a nth pass approach ensures there are more sampled pixels used to produce the final image and this is why the thumbnail has a better quality. Indeed, the downside of this approach is that the process is slower.

It takes about 2-3 seconds to create a thumbnail of a 3 Megapixels picture using 4 pass on a P4 2.66 Ghz FSB 533 with 1 Go memory. JAI native acceleration was not used at all, because I deleted the dll!

For the JAI memory issue, some objects require to call the dispose method (like with ImageReader). Otherwise, some memory resource are not freed. I just spent a day trying to get JMagick to work.

Apparently, its latest release is incompatible with versions of ImageMagick released less than a year ago, and its documentation is a joke. Excerpt from the javadoc: “int getMonochrome – gets the Monochrome attribute” Eventually, I followed your advice and simply used a Runtime.exec command.

The code didn’t get any prettier, but at least it works and is reasonably fast now (platform-independent, even). JNI kind of loses its point when a sytem command works better and is more stable than the interface. It is possible to get ImageMagick’s level of quality when using JAI to resize images. I have written a tool called ThumbMaster which is a new Interpolation implementation that uses the same algorithm as ImageMagick. It allows you resize images using standard JAI APIs without the complexity and overhead of integrating with a command line tool.

More information is available at the tool’s website, devella.net/thumbmaster. Full disclosure: I am the developer of ThumbMaster, and am posting this here because I do believe it is a relevant solution to the problems expressed by many of the above posters. ImageMagick is an excellent package. However, you don’t need to use it to get top-quality scaled images. Image.getScaledInstance(, Image.SCALEAREAAVERAGING) gives you the maximum-possible scaling quality, and you don’t need to mess around with ImageMagick. It’s slow, but I haven’t done performance comparisons, so I don’t know how much slower than IM.

If you want top-quality resizing, without needing to use external binaries, Image.getScaledInstance(, Image.SCALEAREAAVERAGING) is what you need.